Except for gay men. So many guys at Morehouse have gone there just because they know they’ll be in a space with other black gay men. Eventually(as its already happened) the presence of gay men will bring trans/post-gendered students. So we have a group of people who fight to be recognized as another gender asking to be recognized as the male gender. It’s a weird place for Morehouse right now and honestly I believe they have every right to remain a place that portrays a male portrait(didn’t say macho, just said male).

On the flipside, the AUC has a multitude of issues to deal with. Gender politics shouldn’t be that high considering Morehouse, Spelman, and Clark are truthfully one university.

I hear you, sir. I agree with you that people who sag their pants set bad examples for the kids in the community. In terms of Morehouse, what do you think about the attire policy?

Thanks for commenting! Get at me with a reply.

I feel you on the critique about being an informed consumer and taking one’s business (read: money) elsewhere. I support that as a possible solution to the problem. I wonder, however, if that would solve anything in terms of the relationship between the Administration and the students. I think the question at the heart of it…is this Policy consumer(read: student) driven.

I don’t believe it is supported. Even if it is by a large majority, what about those five students who dress in women apparel?

First, thank you for the acknowledgement. I am glad you liked it. I really dug your article in the Root (which is why I did cite it..hahahaa). I wanted to ask you some questions:
1)What are your thoughts on Safe Space, the morehouse gay group, that reportedly gave the nod to Dr. Bynum to go through with Appropriate Attire Policy?
2) Are the students of Morehouse in an uproar about the dress policy?
3) Have you spoken with Dr. Bynum’s fav-five that he singled out?
Sorry to bombard you with questions bro, but it seems like you know wassup over there.